|
Post by Nyi28nhl on Dec 21, 2010 23:23:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MxT13 on Dec 22, 2010 0:29:10 GMT -5
As fiscally conservative as I am, I still love the baseball luxury tax. It does very little to actually curtail the spending of an organization like the Yankees, since $18 million to them is like buying a new television for us, but it still acts as a small slap on the wrist for out-spending everyone else.
I would've loved to see how much their tax would have been had they been able to sign Lee and Werth or Crawford. I do find it a little sad, however, that it seems the Yankees need to have an astounding tax burden in order to win anything.
|
|
|
Post by Nyi28nhl on Dec 22, 2010 9:17:50 GMT -5
I wouldn't say the Yankees are incapable of winning without the luxury tax burden. If you look at those 90s championships they had the highest payroll, but barely. In 1996 there were four other teams within $10M of them. In 1997 it was five other teams. It wasn't until 1999 that they started pulling away, and even then they were only $8M or so ahead of the second highest payroll.
I don't think it's a coincidence that they have only won one championship since they really pulled away in payroll. They just haven't spent the money wisely.
|
|