|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 15:35:43 GMT -5
Post by Nyi28nhl on Dec 28, 2010 15:35:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 17:05:14 GMT -5
Post by MxT13 on Dec 28, 2010 17:05:14 GMT -5
I think it's gotta be Vick. You have to figure that with Kevin Kolb, the Eagles are at best a 9-7 team. To me, that's the definition of "Most Valuable Player."
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 18:10:17 GMT -5
Post by iPatriot on Dec 28, 2010 18:10:17 GMT -5
You know where my vote went. NO ONE has been as dominant this season as Brady has. Where are the Patriots without Brady and Brian Hoyer? 3rd (at best) in the AFC East.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 18:32:47 GMT -5
Post by Nyi28nhl on Dec 28, 2010 18:32:47 GMT -5
You know where my vote went. NO ONE has been as dominant this season as Brady has. Where are the Patriots without Brady and Brian Hoyer? 3rd (at best) in the AFC East. I don't think they would be as good as they are now, however I'm not convinced they would fall that far. If Matt Cassel taught me anything, it's that Belichick > Brady.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 19:13:31 GMT -5
Post by iPatriot on Dec 28, 2010 19:13:31 GMT -5
And if Matt Cassel taught me anything this season, it's that he is an NFL quarterback. Belichick=Brady, Brady=Belichick. They're both the best at what they do.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 19:22:46 GMT -5
Post by MxT13 on Dec 28, 2010 19:22:46 GMT -5
www.nfl.com/players/mattcassel/careerstats?id=CAS541133I don't know about anyone else, but I think 27 TD's and 5 INT's is pretty good. And remember, the Pats went 11-5 when they had Cassel as their QB. With Brady they may have gotten one or two more wins (which would have gotten them a playoff spot), but he was very respectable nonetheless. Kolb on the other hand, would not have won nearly as many games as Vick is. Vick is 8-2 in the games he started and finished, and would be 9-2 if he wasn't knocked out of the Redskins game. Kolb however, is 2-2 with a loss to Tennessee and a 3-point win vs. San Fran. HUGE difference.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 19:32:46 GMT -5
Post by iPatriot on Dec 28, 2010 19:32:46 GMT -5
The Matt Cassel argument in regards to Brady and the 2010 MVP Award are moot. Brian Hoyer is the back up now. In my opinion, Vick was the most exciting player in 2010, Brady was the best player. The stats prove it.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 20:01:27 GMT -5
Post by MxT13 on Dec 28, 2010 20:01:27 GMT -5
You'll find no arguments from me that Brady is the best player. I also think he will be the MVP, because the NFL traditionally does go with the best player rather than the most valuable. But if I were a voter for MVP I see Vick, who takes a team whose total salary in the uncapped year is lower than last year's minimum, doing everything that needs to be done on the field for the Eagles to win the game.
I can't speculate how Brian Hoyer would do across multiple NFL games, partially because I've never heard of him, but that would be the only way to truly break the tie.
|
|
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 21:18:37 GMT -5
Post by BlackOps on Dec 28, 2010 21:18:37 GMT -5
I think it's gotta be Vick. You have to figure that with Kevin Kolb, the Eagles are at best a 9-7 team. To me, that's the definition of "Most Valuable Player." Vick > Kolb Brady >>> Hoyer Kolb is a decent QB. If he started the whole year, they'd probably still be in the playoff mix though perhaps not as good. I don't think the Pats would be near the playoffs if Hoyer was in there.
|
|
ozzie
Junior Member
Posts: 83
|
NFL MVP
Dec 28, 2010 21:40:54 GMT -5
Post by ozzie on Dec 28, 2010 21:40:54 GMT -5
I think, as much as I hate him, that Tom Brady deserves it more than Vick.
|
|
|
Post by Nyi28nhl on Feb 7, 2011 9:20:57 GMT -5
|
|